From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 26 20:30:22 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D011516A41F
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:30:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B87A43D60
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:30:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBQKUL96069878
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:30:22 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBQKULXS069877;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:30:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:30:21 GMT
Message-Id: <200512262030.jBQKULXS069877@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Christian Wittenhorst <wiwi@progon.net>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/90903: cpufreq inconsistency / powerd broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Christian Wittenhorst <wiwi@progon.net>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:30:22 -0000

The following reply was made to PR kern/90903; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Christian Wittenhorst <wiwi@progon.net>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, wiwi@progon.net
Cc:  
Subject: Re: kern/90903: cpufreq inconsistency / powerd broken
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:29:39 +0100

 There's more fix in powerd (still very quick and dirty...). Fixing the 
 inconsistency in cpufreq would be a far better solution...
 
       /*
 * If we're idle less than the active mark, bump up two levels.
 * If we're idle more than the idle mark, drop down one level.
 */
 	for (i = 0; i < numfreqs; i++) {
                         if (freqs[i] == curfreq)
                                 break;
                 }
                 if (i==numfreqs) {
                          i=0;
                 }
 
                 if (idle < (total * cpu_running_mark) / 100 &&
                     curfreq < freqs[0]) {
                         printf("i: %d\n", i);