Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:57:45 +0000 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> Subject: Re: Question about new options framework (regression?) Message-ID: <20120726055745.GF13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <5010D410.8090102@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120725155932.GA13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <201207251709.q6PH9mpJ086314@lurza.secnetix.de> <CACdU%2Bf_RW6eWdW9sZsTDfx7bz7L54u5C6qj-e9cBy714WM6KQA@mail.gmail.com> <5010640B.6070107@FreeBSD.org> <20120725225736.GD13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAF6rxgkYZAMWnNXLEL7ye1A%2Bo_JWs%2B%2BRPRDBjMnLMiDte_Ag1g@mail.gmail.com> <20120726045555.GE13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5010D410.8090102@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uTRFFR9qmiCqR05s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 07:22:24AM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: > On 2012-07-26 06:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:40:56PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> On 25 July 2012 15:57, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: > >>>> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secneti= x.de> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and co= mmand params have priority. > >>>> (Place the make.conf part after the OPTIONS_FILE_SET part) > >>>> > >>>> Until now I cannot see why the OPTIONS file should always win. > >>>> > >>> > >>> because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific= is the > >>> options file. > >>> > >>> if most people want the options file to not have the final priority, = why not, > >>> can others spread their opinion here? > >> > >> An option specified on the command line is more specific and should > >> have priority over saved values or configuration files. > >> > >> --=20 > >> Eitan Adler > >=20 > > You can already do that: > > OPTIONSFILE=3D/my/path/to/options make config > >=20 >=20 > Are you kidding? Sorry I misunderstood Eitan mail :) >=20 > > because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific i= s the options file. >=20 > I suspect no one wants to maintain different option files. > As shown options file is not the most specific one, it's the command arg. --uTRFFR9qmiCqR05s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlAQ3FkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyK3gCgqhZXr2dwjVl+tILMQqGgDMM2 ImkAn0kb89L3l+6IGA0quzAn/NkcFbKk =Lm7O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uTRFFR9qmiCqR05s--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120726055745.GF13771>