From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 30 11:24:45 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2398416A4CF
	for <cvs-src@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:24:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05C3943FE0
	for <cvs-src@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:24:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org)
Received: (qmail 32838 invoked by uid 1002); 30 Oct 2003 19:24:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.4.1.5?) (64.58.1.252)
  by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 30 Oct 2003 19:24:42 -0000
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:27:18 -0700 (MST)
From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.home
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031030.120158.98361878.imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20031030122318.J11750@pooker.samsco.home>
References: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
 <20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031030102144.L89089@root.org>
 <20031030.120158.98361878.imp@bsdimp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: nate@root.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile
 acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:24:45 -0000

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20031030102144.L89089@root.org>
>             Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes:
> : On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
> : >             M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
> : > : The "general silliness of compiling SMP for all modules" was a design
> : > : decision for SMPng made a long time ago.  That's why there's no longer
> : > : a SMP kernel option.
> : >
> : > Actually, I'm smoking crack here.  Forget I said it.
> : >
> : > We do, however, don't use the lock prefix on UP kernels.  Instead,
> : > modules call the atomic functions, rather than inlining them.
> :
> : Whatever you smoke, the bounty is now up to $40, thanks to another donor.
> : Let's see some code!
>
> I'll clean up what I have and commit it.
>
> Warner
>
>

Please, if you're going to do this, do it 100%.  Peter had some
interesting ideas with unifying the building process of the kernel
and modules and making the two basically indistinguishable.  This
would likely get rid of the #ifdef KLD_MODULE hacks running around
too.

Scott