From owner-freebsd-hardware  Thu Apr 17 09:00:42 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA15913
          for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 09:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tyger.inna.net (root@tyger.inna.net [206.151.66.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA15907
          for <hardware@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 09:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from caught.inna.net (caught.inna.net [206.151.66.7]) by tyger.inna.net (8.8.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA23259; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 12:00:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 11:59:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Arnold <tom@inna.net>
To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@mindbender.serv.net>
cc: Doug Russell <drussell@saturn-tech.com>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>,
        Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>, Dave Alderman <dave@persprog.com>,
        hardware@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? 
In-Reply-To: <199704160747.AAA04872@MindBender.serv.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970417115214.25402B-100000@caught.inna.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> That's nice, but can you post a competative comparison against
> something else?  The stats do nothing for me all by themselves.
> Thanks.

Chips I have on hand : K5-133, K6-166, Cyrix 6x86-166.  I will re-bench
all of them on the same board.

If you have benchmarks other then Nsieve and FLOPS you'd like to see run
I'll run them too.  I expect to be able to do this tonight.

     +-----------------------------------------------+
     : Tom Arnold - No relation to Rosanne           :
     : SysAdmin/Pres - TBI, Ltd ( inna.net )         :
     : The Middle Peninsula's Internet Connection    :
     +-----------------------------------------------+