From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Sep 20 19:40:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from atlas.usls.edu (linux1.usls.edu [202.47.133.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208DF152CC for ; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 19:40:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from francis@usls.edu) Received: by atlas.usls.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id A70CEA4BC; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:36:25 +0800 (PHT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlas.usls.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998027D8F for ; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:36:25 +0800 (PHT) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:36:25 +0800 (PHT) From: "Francis A. Vidal" To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: updating on several machines Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi all, i'm about to update several machines using the `buildworld' output from a main machine via NFS. i'm thinking of removing the /usr/ports and /usr/src directories in each of these machines and mount those directories from the main machine. if i'm going to build the kernels for each of these machines, then i should compile them on the main machine, how would this apply to different types of processors, peripherals, etc.? should i leave /usr/src/sys intact on all machines? what is a better of doing this? -- francis vidal university of st. la salle, bacolod city, philippines . . . . . . . PGP key available via e-mail / subject: get PGP key u s l s N E T tel. nos. (6334).435.2324 / 433.3526 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message