From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 28 13:19:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6623152D4 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 13:19:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA24316; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:19:00 GMT Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA81564; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:19:39 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199902282119.OAA81564@harmony.village.org> To: obrien@NUXI.com Subject: Re: gcc Cc: Peter Wemm , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 28 Feb 1999 13:15:03 PST." <19990228131503.A1563@relay.nuxi.com> References: <19990228131503.A1563@relay.nuxi.com> <199902281648.JAA80190@harmony.village.org> <199902281707.BAA63212@spinner.netplex.com.au> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 14:19:39 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <19990228131503.A1563@relay.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : ALSO, don't forget that just getting a FreeBSD'ized EGCS is just the : first step. We will have to test ``build world'' many times and I'm sure : we will have to change base code to compile as we like with EGCS. The : more people that are allowed to get involved with this the faster things : will go. I really want to be involved in this. I'm quite keen on having a newer, cross-compile friendlier compiler in the tree. Point me at something, and I'll test it. BTW, do we need to update binutils? Or are they new enough? I know that my needs for binutils are covered by the missing bits in the current version we have in the tree. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message