From owner-freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org Mon Nov 23 09:10:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sysinstall@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29364A36909 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BD3114A4 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tAN9AZOr076746 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:10:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204698] The default ZFS filesystem layout created by the 9.3 installer is not beadm-friendly Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:10:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vas@mpeks.tomsk.su X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Sysinstall Work List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:10:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204698 --- Comment #5 from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su --- (In reply to vermaden from comment #4) > I assume that the default 10.2-RELEASE install scheme is OK > (while 9.3-RELEASE is not). Correct. > we may change the default in 9-STABLE so the > 9.4-RELEASE would be 'beadm' friendly. That would be great. > or we need to do anything else/more? If we could suggest a workaround to modify $ZFSBOOT_DATASETS during 9.3-RELEASE install process, or at least document it somwhere :-) that would be great too. Where is the $ZFSBOOT_DATASETS syntax documented at all? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.