Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:30:43 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: panic in recent 6-current
Message-ID:  <200502081330.43937.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050208172754.GA25800@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
References:  <20050208140419.GA15236@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20050208164711.GC43179@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050208172754.GA25800@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 12:27 pm, Divacky Roman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:47:11AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:04:19PM +0100, Divacky Roman wrote:
> > > #22 0xc0493087 in softclock (dummy=0x0) at atomic.h:365
> > > #23 0xc04768a3 in ithread_loop (arg=0xc1577480)
> > >     at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:546
> > > #24 0xc0475be9 in fork_exit (callout=0xc0476761 <ithread_loop>,
> > >         arg=0xc1577480, frame=0xd3fc3d48) at
> > > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:790 #25 0xc057ef5c in fork_trampoline ()
> > > at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:208
> > >
> > >
> > > (all other frames are either ??? or from ddb)
> >
> > Are you running a kernel built with -O2 (bad for gdb) or -O?
>
> -Os which is basically -O2, should I test with plain -O ?

-Os also confuses ddb's strack tracer, just stick to -O.  Also, you didn't 
supply the actual panic message.

-- 
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502081330.43937.jhb>