From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 25 5:13:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from keupon.admin.clubint.net (keupon.admin.clubint.net [194.117.201.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C47937B403 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 05:13:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ng@keupon.admin.clubint.net) Received: (from ng@localhost) by keupon.admin.clubint.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f6PCCvo40218 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:12:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ng) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:12:57 +0200 From: Nicolas Grieco To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs to awake and come out of SERVER only market! Message-ID: <20010725141257.D39794@t-online.fr> References: <20010725054417.A76920@edgemaster.zombie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20010725054417.A76920@edgemaster.zombie.org>; from smkelly@zombie.org on Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:44:17AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Come on, desktop is the king and FreeBSD should focus itself evolving in > > desktop market. If you gonna whine about stability, go back to FreeBSD > > 2.x, 3.x. For me, FreeBSD 4.x, 5.x should be more desktop oriented, and > > desktops need performance!!!!! Servers don't need performance ? Desktops don't need stability ? What kind of world do you live in ? You seems to forget that many FreeBSD'ers use it for professional servers and not only as jukebox multimedia. BTW i don't even understand why they should choose between Desktop and Server, i think FreeBSD 4.x could do both perfectly. Regards, -- Glab _ ASCII RIBBON / \ CAMPAIGN \ / - X AGAINST HTML / \ MAIL To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message