From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 15 13: 6:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from relay3-gui.server.ntli.net (relay3-gui.server.ntli.net [194.168.4.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0115237B416; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pc3-card3-0-cust122.cdf.cable.ntl.com ([62.254.251.122] helo=rhadamanth.private.submonkey.net ident=exim) by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 164ThF-0004I1-00; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 21:05:17 +0000 Received: from setantae by rhadamanth.private.submonkey.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 164Tfc-000BGI-00; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 21:03:36 +0000 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 21:03:36 +0000 From: setantae To: Fernan Aguero Cc: questions@freebsd.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: perl-5.6.1 still FORBIDDEN? Message-ID: <20011115210336.GA43175@rhadamanth> Mail-Followup-To: setantae , Fernan Aguero , questions@freebsd.org, stable@FreeBSD.org References: <20011114154706.E3547@iib005.iib.unsam.edu.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011114154706.E3547@iib005.iib.unsam.edu.ar> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 03:47:06PM -0300, Fernan Aguero wrote: [Fernan's entire post included as I'm cc'ing this to -stable as well] > [ please CC me since I'm not subscribed to the list] > > I am running FreeBSD-4.3 (RELENG_4_3) > > I see that perl-5.6.1 is still marked as FORBIDDEN in the ports. > > However from browsing the archives of this and other lists I > understand that the problem with 5.6.1 is that some modules don't work > with this version (mostly due to bad checking on the perl version). > > I've seen mentioned that perl 5 goes deep into the 'base' system, so > it is not advisable to install 5.6.1 over 5.00x. > > Is this still valid? > > Is this related to the problems with modules, or is this related to > other reasons? > > Is it safe to have both versions installed together? > Perhaps it is safer to have /usr/local/perl56 and use the following at > the top of each script: > #!/usr/local/perl56/bin/perl ? > > (would I have to install all modules again in the new location?) > > Thanks in advance, > > Fernan I was thinking about this the other day. I think it might be possible to work around this situation by : 1) Change every perl script in the base system so that the shebang line reads #!/usr/bin/perl5.00503 instead of just plain old "#!/usr/bin/perl"; and 2) Install perl5.6.1 but tell that you don't want to include any older perl libraries in the @INC array. I haven't done any investigation into this whatsoever (in fact this is the first time I've been near a computer since I thought of this), but I can't immediately think of any reasons why this would be unfeasible. Anyone ?? Ceri -- keep a mild groove on To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message