Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:35:21 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another problem with the new CAM error handling Message-ID: <200104261435.f3QEZLs23573@aslan.scsiguy.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2001 11:05:42 %2B0200." <20010426110542.A50185@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Apr 26 11:03:16 uriah /boot/kernel/kernel: (pt0:sym1:0:5:0): SEND(06). CDB: a >0 0 0 2 0 >Apr 26 11:03:16 uriah /boot/kernel/kernel: (pt0:sym1:0:5:0): CAM Status: SCSI >Status Error >Apr 26 11:03:16 uriah /boot/kernel/kernel: (pt0:sym1:0:5:0): SCSI Status: Chec >k Condition >Apr 26 11:03:17 uriah /boot/kernel/kernel: (pt0:sym1:0:5:0): UNIT ATTENTION >Apr 26 11:03:17 uriah /boot/kernel/kernel: (pt0:sym1:0:5:0): Unretryable error >Apr 26 11:03:17 uriah /boot/kernel/kernel: (pt0:sym1:0:5:0): Invalidating devi >ce > >I thought a UA condition would always be retried? In particular, >it should never end up in an `invalidating device' message. The peripheral driver must specify that the UA condition should be retried in its call to cam_periph_error(). The pt driver must not do that. The new error recovery code isn't responsible for this error. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104261435.f3QEZLs23573>