Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:56:28 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: luigi@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org>, Steve Kiernan <stevek@juniper.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, zec@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [JNPR] Network stack as a module (RFC) Message-ID: <5D6C46A7-4C36-4477-B088-E6011E1C4405@xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20131118164149.GV7577@glebius.int.ru> References: <CC6EF6B2.1917A%anshukla@juniper.net> <f1d8693fa83965f0d4a485a2db7e603b@novexsolutions.com> <50F868FF.5060506@networx.ch> <20131115165210.23f82578@stevek-ubuntu> <20131116084919.GF7577@glebius.int.ru> <1DAF9090-08DA-404B-B86B-57E5D124D70D@xcllnt.net> <20131118164149.GV7577@glebius.int.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > Have you measured the performance impact on the loadable stack? I > suppose many functions, that are now called directly, with loadable > stack will be called via functon pointers. No impact. Building the stack as a module doesn't actually change any function calls. > M> It all really comes in handy for the opaque ifnet work... > > Actually I wanted to start it for a long time. But since at > EuroBSDCon 2011 you said that you plan to import Junipers' > transform of ifnet, I held off my intentions. Until now I > was almost sure that plan on brining junipers ifnet was > abandoned. I think there's been a communication problem. I'll talk to you and Andre offline... -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5D6C46A7-4C36-4477-B088-E6011E1C4405>