From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 18 17:56:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B08F34F9; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [50.0.150.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8845C2B45; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marcelm-sslvpn-nc.jnpr.net ([66.129.239.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAIHuYxR014705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:56:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\)) Subject: Re: [JNPR] Network stack as a module (RFC) From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <20131118164149.GV7577@glebius.int.ru> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:56:28 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <5D6C46A7-4C36-4477-B088-E6011E1C4405@xcllnt.net> References: <50F868FF.5060506@networx.ch> <20131115165210.23f82578@stevek-ubuntu> <20131116084919.GF7577@glebius.int.ru> <1DAF9090-08DA-404B-B86B-57E5D124D70D@xcllnt.net> <20131118164149.GV7577@glebius.int.ru> To: Gleb Smirnoff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822) Cc: luigi@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar , Steve Kiernan , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, zec@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:56:39 -0000 On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > Have you measured the performance impact on the loadable stack? I > suppose many functions, that are now called directly, with loadable > stack will be called via functon pointers. No impact. Building the stack as a module doesn't actually change any function calls. > M> It all really comes in handy for the opaque ifnet work... > > Actually I wanted to start it for a long time. But since at > EuroBSDCon 2011 you said that you plan to import Junipers' > transform of ifnet, I held off my intentions. Until now I > was almost sure that plan on brining junipers ifnet was > abandoned. I think there's been a communication problem. I'll talk to you and Andre offline... -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net