From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 5 09:49:13 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA18755 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 5 Feb 1999 09:49:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA18746 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 1999 09:49:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.9.2/8.9.2/Netplex) with ESMTP id BAA31100; Sat, 6 Feb 1999 01:48:46 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199902051748.BAA31100@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: W Gerald Hicks cc: Wilko Bulte , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 100baseTX problems with the DE500 ethernet cardn In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Feb 1999 12:57:09 EST." <199902051757.MAA33170@bellsouth.net> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 01:48:46 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG W Gerald Hicks wrote: > Hi Wilko, > > I suppose you're aware that the 21143 is not strictly compatible with > the 21140? VxWorks, Linux, and quite a few other OS's are playing > catch-up with this SNAFU too... > > ISTR that Mike Smith had worked on something related to 21143 > compatibility. Don't know if it is finished. The funny thing is that I suggested to somebody to get a stack of 2114x cards before they disappeared. They got a handful of netgear FA310TX cards with 21143's on them. They worked first go, but that was with replicated systems that had 3.0-current's if_de driver on a very hacked 2.2.8. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message