Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 19:03:39 +0200 From: Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de> To: Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com> Cc: "'jb@syndicate.net'" <jb@syndicate.net>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unacceptably poor samba performance. Message-ID: <19990831190339.A21247@internal> In-Reply-To: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB4401105C0E@site2s1> References: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB4401105C0E@site2s1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 31-Aug-1999 at 11:51:41 -0400, Christopher Michaels wrote: > Actually the problem is solved. There is a bug/incompatibility in Samba > 2.0.5a that causes horrible performance on FreeBSD. Apparently it's not a > problem on other OS's. The changes that were made actually improve > performance on other OS's. > > Anyway, downgrading is an option except that there are 3 security holes that > have been fixed in 2.0.5a. There was a patch/fix posted to the > comp.protocols.smb news groups by one of the samba dev team. > > I should check back in there an see if there have been any new developments, > as this was a couple weeks ago now. My write performance went up to old values with sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 My read performance increased with socket options = TCP_NODELAY -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990831190339.A21247>