From owner-cvs-all Tue Jan 22 4:26:36 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDF937B404; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 04:26:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 0FCF5532C; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:26:30 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Benno Rice Cc: Kirk McKusick , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_alloc.c ffs_extern.h ffs_softdep.c References: <200201220617.g0M6HOx41725@freefall.freebsd.org> <1011697733.442.0.camel@ratchet.jeamland.net> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 22 Jan 2002 13:26:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1011697733.442.0.camel@ratchet.jeamland.net> Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Benno Rice writes: > This change breaks kernels without softupdates. Why do we even bother supporting that? (apart from the fact that the installation kernel is built without SU, though it would greatly benefit from it: in most cases, installation is bounded by the filesystem write speed) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message