From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Apr 28 13:36:25 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA23316 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freenet.hamilton.on.ca (main.freenet.hamilton.on.ca [199.212.94.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA23307 Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:36:22 -0700 (PDT) From: hoek@freenet.hamilton.on.ca Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca [199.212.94.66]) by freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA22055; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 16:36:00 -0400 Received: (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.6.12/8.6.12) id QAA12690; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 16:09:41 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 16:09:30 -0400 (EDT) To: Gary Palmer cc: chat@freebsd.org, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Subject: Re: Unixware In-Reply-To: <3157.830522276@palmer.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 26 Apr 1996, Gary Palmer wrote: > Seven switch to the Unixware standard > ------------------------------------- ... > vice-president for enterprise solutions. "But it also makes it cheaper > and easier for the software vendors to have only a single, Unixware > version to port to. It can cost about $1m for every Unix port." Wow! At a modest estimate, let's put 50 ports in the FreeBSD ports collection. That's $50 million right there! -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk