From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 18 8:56:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from po4.wam.umd.edu (po4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EBE37BB9F for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:56:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from howardjp@wam.umd.edu) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (root@rac2.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.142]) by po4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05595 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:56:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac2.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA25848 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:56:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac2.wam.umd.edu (howardjp@localhost) by rac2.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA25843 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:56:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200004181556.LAA25843@rac2.wam.umd.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: rac2.wam.umd.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Shell games Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:56:28 -0400 From: James Howard Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might have been asked before. Does the csh->tcsh move imply that sh->ksh will be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago? J~ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message