From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 16:48:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034BA37B401; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:48:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111B743FBD; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:48:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h39Nn1YY031439; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:49:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:49:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Nate Lawson In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Alfred Perlstein cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Mike Barcroft Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.c src/usr.sbin Makefile src/usr.sbin/jail jail.8 jail.c src/usr.sbin/jexec Makefile jexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 23:48:43 -0000 On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Robert Watson [030409 16:24] wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > > > > > > And there can't be names spoofing. (If, ofcourse '.' is invalid char in > > > > jail name:)). > > > > > > Sounds reasonable to me, although a bit more trouble to parse and render > > > :-). > > > > And what kind of path seperator is '.'? > > Exactly. What you're describing would be better implemented as a > pseudo-fs layer. In fact, that would remove the need for separate j* > utilities. I thought we were trying to get away from synthetic file systems with terrible security properties. In fact, we specifically toasted procfs because it behaved so badly; kernfs went down the tubes because the semantic match was very poor, and sysctl is in. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories