From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 17 12:58: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from superconductor.rush.net (superconductor.rush.net [208.9.155.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E0037B409 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:57:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@superconductor.rush.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by superconductor.rush.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f5HJvfA30437; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:57:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:57:40 -0400 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Sascha Schumann Cc: Valentin Nechayev , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: poll(2)'s arbitrary limit Message-ID: <20010617155740.O1832@superconductor.rush.net> References: <20010617153129.N1832@superconductor.rush.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us In-Reply-To: ; from sascha@schumann.cx on Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 09:53:59PM +0200 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Sascha Schumann [010617 15:54] wrote: > > > As far as raising the amount of pollable entries, can you try your > > app with your kernel recompiled to accept 2xNO_FILE and 2xFD_SETSIZE > > and let us know if that solves your problem? > > I've been using kern.maxproc=kern.maxprocfiles=2*32768 for my > tests and that worked successfully. Ok, so then we don't need to change FreeBSD? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message