From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 1 06:26:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E1B106564A for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunpoet@sunpoet.net) Received: from sunpoet.net (sunpoet.net [220.133.12.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110888FC0C for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sunpoet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A563D3CD5; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:25:24 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:25:24 +0800 From: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20110801062524.GI15520@bonjour.sunpoet.net> References: <20110731213748.GA3533@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110731213748.GA3533@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: porter handbook MASTER_SITES section outdated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 06:26:15 -0000 On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:37:48PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > In sec 5.4.2 MASTER_SITES in the porter handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html#AEN1512 > > the example given is: > > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU} > > However, sunpoet@ has just committed my patch > changing my ${IGNORE_MASTER_SITE_XCONTRIB} and > ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} to: > > MASTER_SITES= XCONTRIB/applications \ > http://seis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/ \ > LOCAL/simon > > Are both forms acceptable? Or is the form > given in the porters handbook outdated? Hi Anton, I'm using the condensed format (the second grey box in that section). It's more clear as the complex MASTER_SITES/MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR modifiers (${foo:S///} and :foo) can be eliminated in your case. Thanks. Regards, sunpoet