From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jun 22 02:13:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA17614 for current-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 02:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA17600 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 02:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) id LAA10674 for current@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:00:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.gtn.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA00419 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:22:15 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:22:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andreas Klemm To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: The FreeBSD Way In-Reply-To: <987.835405083@critter.tfs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 21 Jun 1996, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> >Hmm, I thought, that many sysadmin tools were written in tk... > >> >admintool, swmtool ... Am I so wrong ??? > >> > >> no, you are right. > > > >No, he was wrong. I've got a Solaris 2.5 box sitting *right here*, and > >all of the tool program are binaries and have *NO* TK strings in them. > > > well, on 2.4 they were... I think, too, that I have detected traces of tk, when I had a sparcstation 2 at home with Solaris 2.4 Hardware 11/94. I think they did the admintool with that. > >of Solaris 2.5 (the most recent release) there is *NO* trace of TK > >anywhere on the system. > It's probably Java :-) hehehe ;-)) -- andreas@klemm.gtn.com /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ Support Unix -- andreas.klemm@wup.de pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<<