From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon Apr  1 12:57:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-isp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA28011
          for isp-outgoing; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 12:57:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from itchy.mosquito.com (root@itchy.mosquito.com [206.205.132.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA28005
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 12:57:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from boot@localhost) by itchy.mosquito.com (8.6.11/8.6.12) id PAA10027 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 15:57:15 -0500
From: Bruce Bauman <boot@mosquito.com>
Message-Id: <199604012057.PAA10027@itchy.mosquito.com>
Subject: named and IP aliases
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 15:57:14 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

We are a small ISP running vanilla 2.1-stable. We run virtual web servers for
several of our customers via Apache and IP aliases. Now for the question:

I saw a recent post saying that named had a bug where it would listen on
all of the "aliased" interfaces, which are really all the same host. Is this
bug present in -stable, and if so should we update to the newest named?

Thanks in advance.

-- Bruce