From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 19:58:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EB2677 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:58:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AE18FC12 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id qALJxa2u013758 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:59:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:59:36 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201211211959.qALJxa2u013758@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:58:43 -0000 > From: jb > Subject: Re: portsnap > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:43:30 +0000 (UTC) > > So, the manual for portsnap(8) is imprecise, actually unfortunate because > misleading. The manual/ manpage for portsnap(8) and its use of 'command' is precise *and* entirely consistant with roughly 40(!!) years of Unix documentation history. (see, for instance, the 'mt' manpage, which existed before 6th Edition Unix.) And, of course, if one follows/accepts jb's "reasoning", that which follows the '-c' parameter on a shell invocation is not a command. nor is that which follows '-exec' on a 'find' invocation. nor is that which follows the 'exec' command. ` *snicker*