From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 02:20:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EF837B401; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au [210.50.30.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E71343F3F; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:20:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au) Received: from dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au (210.50.88.137) by smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.015) id 3EF6A74E0008A42D; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:20:17 +1000 Received: by dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 236B4C1CC; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:20:02 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:20:01 +1000 From: "Tim J. Robbins" To: Juli Mallett , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andrey Chernov Message-ID: <20030625192001.A10405@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <20030624183515.A42570@FreeBSD.org> <1056499632.662.7.camel@timon.nist> <3EF922BE.4070803@acm.org> <20030624234707.A59666@FreeBSD.org> <20030625001525.A60867@FreeBSD.org> <20030625060450.GX57612@funkthat.com> <20030625074151.GY57612@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030625074151.GY57612@funkthat.com>; from gurney_j@efn.org on Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:41:51AM -0700 Subject: Re: tcsh being dodgy, or pipe code ishoos? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:20:20 -0000 On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:41:51AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: [...] > So, now the question is, do we fix xargs to deal with unexpected > children? Or fix the shells in question? (tcsh and zsh seem to suffer > this problem) > > To me, fixing xargs is correct since it prevents another possible > future abusers of this "feature". Feel free to get rid of the -P option. What tcsh and zsh are doing is a fairly bad idea though, and it will break more than just xargs. Tim