Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 07:59:51 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>, niek@bergboer.net, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS block size vs. write speed Message-ID: <20010421075951.B72704@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010420075203.T1790@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 07:52:03AM -0700 References: <20010420144543.F30241@wit379119.student.utwente.nl> <20010420055426.Q1790@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010420152029.A35974@wit379119.student.utwente.nl> <20010420093530.A98970@cec.wustl.edu> <20010420075203.T1790@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 07:52:03AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Soft updates isn't an "async" or "sync" thing. It combines synchronous > > and asynchronous transfers. If I'm not mistaken, all metadata is > > synchronously written, and all data is asynchronously written. > > You're mistaken, what you're describing is the old > non-async/non-softupdates way. ^^^^^^^^^ actually its called "nosync". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010421075951.B72704>