From owner-freebsd-isp Wed May 31 8:30:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from durango.picus.com (durango.picus.com [209.100.20.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E07437BEAB for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 08:30:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from troy@picus.com) Received: from arcadia [209.100.20.198] by durango.picus.com (SMTPD32-5.05) id AFC515F0208; Wed, 31 May 2000 11:29:09 -0400 From: "Troy Settle" To: "Ryugen C. Fisher" , "Dan Harnett" Cc: "Corey Ralph" , Subject: RE: Using radius to NT server? Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 11:33:14 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20000531101912.00a98a10@mail.palaver.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ** IIRC the port 1645 for Radius is the port that is used by Livingston for ** there Portmaster Routers, etc. Livingston (now a div of AT&T) is Livingston was borged by Lucent, not AT&T. Lucent was spun from AT&T after the breakup (IIRC). ** the shop ** where Radius was first drafted, written and implemented. As a ** result most ** "older" radius software and hardware use the 1645 port... I ** have not read ** the RFC and would frankly be curious as to how the port got changed from ** the "factory' spec to port 1812. Livingston used 1645/1646 because they thought those ports were availiable. In reality, those ports were reserved for some obscure service. When the IETF(?) got ahold of the Radius RFC, they found a pair of ports more suitable for the application. 1812/1813. -Troy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message