Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Mar 1995 22:09:01 -0800
From:      David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
To:        Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Cc:        terry@cs.weber.edu, hasty@star-gate.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Why IDE is bad 
Message-ID:  <199503230609.WAA00166@corbin.Root.COM>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Mar 95 23:35:37 CST." <199503230535.XAA04934@bonkers.taronga.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>    It should do what the manual page says it does, which is to force all I/O
>> to the filesystem to be done asynchronously.
>
>Um, all I/O to the file system is already done asynchronously. It's got
>internal sequencing of metadata but that shouldn't be visible to the
>process.

   It's the metadata I/O that we're talking about. ...and yes, the process
will definately see it if the operation involves lots of file creates. It is
inherently unsafe to do metadata I/O asynchronously, which is why the manual
page says:

             async   All I/O to the file system should be done asynchronously.
                     This is a dangerous flag to set, and should not be used
                     unless you are prepared to recreate the file system
                     should your system crash.


-DG



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503230609.WAA00166>