Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 May 2017 20:09:06 +0200
From:      Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl>
To:        bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>, ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: www/epiphany wants graphics/gdk-pixbuf that's not available in ports
Message-ID:  <1495130946.27353.3.camel@rainbow-runner.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20170518031654.GA4155@www.zefox.net>
References:  <20170518031654.GA4155@www.zefox.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 20:16 -0700, bob prohaska wrote:

Hi,

> For some reason the port of www/epiphany is asking for a  version
> of graphics/gdk-pixbuf (2.36.5) later than the most recent version 
> available via svn ( 2.32.3).

Epiphany depends on graphics/gdk-pixbuf2 not the really older gdk-
pixbuf.

> Perhaps more curiously, when looking in graphics/gdk-pixbuf the
> directory
> listing reports the presence of gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0 which seems most
> confusing. That's the source directory which gave rise to 2.32.3
> found
> by www/epiphany.

I think your trying to build ports from the HEAD ports tree, but have
quartery packages installed. Gdk-pixbuf2 was updated to 2.36 in April,
so that version is not available as a package in the 2017Q2 quartery
branch.

-Koop

> Is something entirely mixed up? This is on RPI2 running -current, but
> that isn't obviously relevant: Far as I can see, port names aren't
> platform
> specific. I.e., "ports is ports". (apologies to Walt Kelley) 
> 
> Thanks for reading,
> 
> bob prohaska
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.o
> rg"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1495130946.27353.3.camel>