From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Mar 27 19:20:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A1A37B99A for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 19:20:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA24284 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 05:23:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id FAA04122 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 05:20:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [212.154.129.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7127837B7F4 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 19:19:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bp@butya.kz) Received: from bp (helo=localhost) by relay.butya.kz with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12ZmXi-000FMf-00; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:19:46 +0700 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:19:46 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov To: Chris Costello Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Union mount of fdesc on top of /dev In-Reply-To: <20000327180956.L18325@holly.calldei.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Chris Costello wrote: > On Monday, March 27, 2000, Boris Popov wrote: > > While this may help in the non-devfs case it is not valid for > > devfs, because devfs is able to handle such things natively and union > > mount is just an additional overload. > > At its current pace, however, devfs will be complete and ready > for production roughly 30 minutes after the Sun explodes. I've done some work to improve devfs code, right now all my spare time dedicated to smbfs and I'll return to devfs after initial release of smbfs. -- Boris Popov To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message