From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 6 06:28:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA18368 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 06:28:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA18339 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 06:27:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfieber@indiana.edu) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA11228; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:25:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:25:53 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Calin Andrian cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Powering off the system/UPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe hackers" On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Calin Andrian wrote: > I followed all your mail about how to patch the kernel. I seems that the > solution that would satisfy (more or less) everybody would be an extra > list for at_shutdown where both apm and ups drivers can insert callbacks. > (the way I patched my system's kernel - haha). Maybe I missed it in the thread, but why it is a Good Thing to put UPS support in the kernel as opposed to a purely user mode daemon that monitors the UPS and does the Right Thing, like shutdown(8), when things get to a critical state? -john