Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:18:40 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New rules for naming patches Message-ID: <20000719181840.E13769@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <3975CBB2.CE38F8EB@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 06:39:30PM %2B0300 References: <3975AFE6.EBB9FB9@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007190959220.3080-100000@blues.jpj.net> <20000719171403.A13769@cichlids.cichlids.com> <3975CBB2.CE38F8EB@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.org): > It may be even worse: patch-subdir1_subdir2_subdir3_file.name__foo__bar.c > if the original file is name_foo_bar.c Yes. That is overhead and should be corrected manually :) Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000719181840.E13769>