From owner-freebsd-isp  Tue Apr  8 14:02:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA01507
          for isp-outgoing; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 14:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA01501
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 14:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ntws (ntws.etinc.com [204.141.95.142]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA13508; Tue, 8 Apr 1997 17:07:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970408170104.00b1d8c0@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 1997 17:01:06 -0400
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Anthony Barlow <tony@warp.co.uk>
From: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: POP servers
Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 12:16 PM 4/8/97 -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
>> Does anyone know of an alternative pop3 server than qpopper? I believe
>> qpopper leaves files all over the place.
>
>Hmm, we use qpopper exclusively here for *all* of our email, and I don't
>see any 'files' all over the place.  (We're a business and not an ISP,
>so the 'users' are employees and have pretty standard/decent hardware).
>Granted, our connections are pretty good (mostly dedicated), but even
>the non-dedicated connections aren't leaving stuff around.
>
>+OK QPOP (version 2.2) at ns.mt.sri.com starting.
<1949.860523395@ns.mt.sri.com
>

We have no problems as well, however we are using Eudora, and since popper is
maintained by Qualcomm, it d*mn well better work! It also works ok with
Microsoft
mail...so you may want to look at your client.

Dennis