From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  1 11:04:55 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3946816A41F
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Sep 2005 11:04:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from nicolas@i.0x5.de)
Received: from narr.dauerreden.de (n.0x5.de [217.197.85.142])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D01C43D48
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Sep 2005 11:04:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from nicolas@i.0x5.de)
Received: by pc5.i.0x5.de (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 13B8181C41; Thu,  1 Sep 2005 13:04:52 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:04:52 +0200
From: Nicolas Rachinsky <fbsd-div-0@ml.turing-complete.org>
To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20050901110452.GC31138@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
References: <200508312232.j7VMW5p1054040@bernina.office>
	<12110289463.20050901115430@spaingsm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <12110289463.20050901115430@spaingsm.com>
X-Powered-by: FreeBSD
X-Homepage: http://www.rachinsky.de
X-PGP-Keyid: A32C2932 (Communication) and F66AFAF2 (Certification)
X-PGP-Fingerprint1: 97EB FA8B 4C8F A54B D89A 697E A6BC AF72 A32C 2932 (Comm.)
X-PGP-Fingerprint2: 1DE8 DF23 56F0 3E14 238D 740C E598 C87E F66A FAF2 (Cert.)
X-PGP-Keys: http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/pgp/nicolas_rachinsky.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Subject: Re: in via or in recv
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:04:55 -0000

* vladone <vladone@spaingsm.com> [2005-09-01 11:54 +0300]:
> So:
> in via fxp0 = in recv fxp0?

Yes.

> out via fxp0 = out xmit fxp0?

AFAIK it's
out via fxp0 = out (recv fxp0 or xmit fxp0)
               I'm not shure if this is valid ipfw syntax

But after looking in the man page again I'm not shure if it's
out via fxp0 = out recv fxp0 xmit fxp0
"The via keyword causes the interface to always be checked."

It seems to be a good thing, that I don't use 'via'.

Nicolas (a bit confused now)