Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:04:52 +0200 From: Nicolas Rachinsky <fbsd-div-0@ml.turing-complete.org> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: in via or in recv Message-ID: <20050901110452.GC31138@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> In-Reply-To: <12110289463.20050901115430@spaingsm.com> References: <200508312232.j7VMW5p1054040@bernina.office> <12110289463.20050901115430@spaingsm.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* vladone <vladone@spaingsm.com> [2005-09-01 11:54 +0300]:
> So:
> in via fxp0 = in recv fxp0?
Yes.
> out via fxp0 = out xmit fxp0?
AFAIK it's
out via fxp0 = out (recv fxp0 or xmit fxp0)
I'm not shure if this is valid ipfw syntax
But after looking in the man page again I'm not shure if it's
out via fxp0 = out recv fxp0 xmit fxp0
"The via keyword causes the interface to always be checked."
It seems to be a good thing, that I don't use 'via'.
Nicolas (a bit confused now)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050901110452.GC31138>