From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 19 16:46:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B5F16A418 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12CB13C461 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from [10.0.0.222] (p54.kientzle.com [66.166.149.54]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l7JGk3H7057673; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:46:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Message-ID: <46C873CB.7010503@kientzle.com> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:46:03 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060422 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy References: <46C79A74.9050703@kientzle.com> <20070819024258.GA23080@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20070819024258.GA23080@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'freebsd-current@freebsd.org'" , Joerg Sonnenberger Subject: Re: RFC: #mtree signature X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:46:11 -0000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2007-Aug-18 18:18:44 -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>Any concerns or thoughts about the following >>patch, which simply adds "#mtree" as the first >>line of every mtree file? > > > Sounds like a good idea. I would suggest that if we're going to add > a signature block, it include a version string in case we want to > incompatibly change the mtree format at some future date. > > Maybe: "#mtree v1.0\n". Good point. That will mean a little more effort to coordinate with the NetBSD folks, who have already revved the format. I suppose their "mtree -C" format should be marked "#mtree v2.0\n". Tim Kientzle