From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Aug 22 19:06:33 1996
Return-Path: owner-chat
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA20040
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 19:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from quagmire.ki.net (root@quagmire.ki.net [205.150.102.51])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA20035
          for <chat@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 19:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by quagmire.ki.net (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id WAA19552; Thu, 22 Aug 1996 22:06:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 22:06:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
To: Hal Snyder <hal@post.vale.com>
cc: "'chat@freebsd.org'" <chat@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: FW: http://www3.sco.com/Company/Announce/p081996e.htm
In-Reply-To: <01BB8F74.DF125700@jaguar>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.960822220547.19504A-100000@quagmire.ki.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 21 Aug 1996, Hal Snyder wrote:

> As Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>  
> > 	From the last time I used SCO...why would anyone want it, when
> > there are *better* (IMHO!) Unix variants out like FreeBSD and NetBSD
> > that have always been free...?
> 
> What else would you use to talk to Dialogic cards or low-end SQL servers?
>
	I may be taking some bait here...but ... low-end SQL servers?

Marc G. Fournier                                  scrappy@ki.net
Systems Administrator @ ki.net               scrappy@freebsd.org