From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 18:50:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADE110656D2 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@bluelife.at) Received: from mail.itac.at (mail.itac.at [213.47.211.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F758FC14 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@bluelife.at) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.itac.at) by mail.itac.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LOcjX-00031U-SB; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:50:55 +0100 Received: from 78.142.74.81 (SquirrelMail authenticated user decke@bluelife.at) by webmail.itac.at with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:50:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <6f7772b758928744df0348d5fdb21973.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> In-Reply-To: References: <20090110162025.3fa38c70@chii.bluelife.at> <39b650464a96fa082375cd320c27299d.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:50:55 +0100 (CET) From: Bernhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=F6hlich?= To: "Torfinn Ingolfsen" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amule 2.2.3 port - ready for test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:51:00 -0000 On Sun, January 18, 2009 1:05 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Bernhard Fröhlich > wrote: >> On Sat, January 10, 2009 5:28 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Bernhard Froehlich >>> wrote: >>>> I've applied your patch and compiled the port in an i386 Tinderbox for >>>> 6-STABLE and 7-STABLE. It compiles fine but leaves a few files behind >>>> and deletes a few directories which it shouldn't. >>> >>> Thanks for testing. A new patch will be sent to the mailing list. >>> I really must get my own tinderbox running again soon. >> >> I've build your -5 patch and tinderbox keeps complaining about some >> missing directories. > > I'm still having problems getting my own tinderbox to run. Maybe I > should just reinstall it (it was upgraded). > > amule - I wonder why 'port test' doesn't complain about missing files > like your tinderbox does? To be exact tinderbox complains about some directories that you have removed but you shouldn't. So just remove these lines from pkg-plist and tinderbox should be happy with it. portlint and port-tools are great tools for a quick check but a tinderbox can detect a lot more errors because it builds the ports in a clean environment so none of them can replace one another. Use them in combination and you catch most of the errors. -- Bernhard Fröhlich http://www.bluelife.at/