From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jun 14 21:40: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546C637B431 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5F4e2937570; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200206150440.g5F4e2937570@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: David Malone Subject: Re: misc/39202: ata(4) refer to sysctl(8) instead of atacontrol(8). Reply-To: David Malone Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/39202; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Malone To: Cyrille Lefevre Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, sos@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/39202: ata(4) refer to sysctl(8) instead of atacontrol(8). Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 05:32:59 +0100 > why do you get rid of this sample section, that I've translated to > atacontrol(8) equivalents, which may help many people having troubles > w/ ATA modes ? I was really just suggesting that we sync up ata(4) with -current. > an alternative would be to move it to a true EXAMPLES section in > atacontrol(8) ? I think adding them to the examples section of atacontrol would probably be a better idea, though Soren might have a better informed opinion. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message