From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 10 08:42:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17890106564A for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:42:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itechbear@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53998FC0C for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so2564639obb.13 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:42:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vbPxw6GUY/goOAs2BpiRxbmcarCpamByO31nkXj0kiQ=; b=DAd7CywRH1Bvq4XsmWPtQo0ixrz4G9LmTVu6J/xwkWGS5y5M7kgclZMwkM06SKcwYi +fzw02MmpoklHKMS0SJDT4czxSCZRrUYaI15xRCCKmgihw5U1ssajQUooI/ICJzFfC8P UfxIbsLv+gOsl1AXIp9JLCqCo297NTOtf9HrqMH2PWUZCU42XSQkjtlggAg+YBe5az4e XDEGZGX6krQvDyn9pn8EAAQB8FSxj8sMQDJfYwNtzu4s+Zr5qppHvQOpmttaO8bnO39V 1I28+YEg7L9su9RtAfaeIIkgyE38eeqiVi1aWmutxyKyFodfzILm2NO/A2kvYMLHYDxC TJ6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.144.68 with SMTP id sk4mr3324431obb.0.1344588152955; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.10.41 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:42:32 +0800 Message-ID: From: HU Dong To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:42:40 -0000 kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR. B.R. HU Dong