From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Feb 22 6:17: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28D737B416 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 06:17:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16eGYW-000E9n-00; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:20:12 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Tim Robbins Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/35201: link and unlink are not SUSv2-compliant as the manpage states In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:18:52 +0200." <54382.1014387532@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:20:12 +0200 Message-ID: <54422.1014387612@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:18:52 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > The whole point of these alternatives to ln/rm is that they have a > simple, optionless interface. :-( Bleh, what an entirely useless response. :-) I should have gone on to say... However, standards conformance is probably important, even here. If scripts expect 'link -- foo bar' to work, and yet it breaks in FreeBSD, that'll be bad. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message