Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:20:12 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Tim Robbins <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/35201: link and unlink are not SUSv2-compliant as the manpage states Message-ID: <54422.1014387612@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:18:52 %2B0200." <54382.1014387532@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:18:52 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > The whole point of these alternatives to ln/rm is that they have a > simple, optionless interface. :-( Bleh, what an entirely useless response. :-) I should have gone on to say... However, standards conformance is probably important, even here. If scripts expect 'link -- foo bar' to work, and yet it breaks in FreeBSD, that'll be bad. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54422.1014387612>