From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 21 12:15:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12458 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 12:15:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA12407 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 12:15:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from benedict@echonyc.com) Received: from localhost by echonyc.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA20321; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 15:14:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 15:14:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre Reply-To: ben@rosengart.com To: "Dag-Erling C. Smrgrav" cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: shouting in a void? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21 Sep 1998, Dag-Erling C. [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: > It's still "all or nothing" AFAIK, but unless you have a slow link, I > don't see the big problem with subscribing to cvs-all. You can set up > a simple procmail script to filter out everything that matches e.g. > ^Subject:.*cvs commit: (ports|www|doc).*$ I'm tired of jumping through hoops. I'm going pretty far out of my way to be helpful to the FreeBSD project and to myself by spotting problems in 3.0-alpha^H^H^H^H^Hbeta, and all I hear is that I'm not doing enough. Is core interested in a stable 3.0-RELEASE or is the idea just to alienate enough users that the complaint volume is low anyway? Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message