From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Nov  7 11:35:09 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA12649
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 11:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA12638
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 11:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id LAA17788
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 11:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id NAA11112; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 13:00:57 -0600
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Message-Id: <199611071900.NAA11112@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Subject: Re: still no response
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 13:00:56 -0600 (CST)
Cc: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, terry@lambert.org, julian@whistle.com,
        hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199611071849.LAA10416@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Nov 7, 96 11:49:55 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > > The session number limit is set external to the inetd (think: number of
> > > child processes).
> > 
> > Yes, but that is not "per inetd, and it's compiled in".
> 
> OK, ok: you could kludge your RC file to divorce the environment
> dependency.
> 
> I'd prefer to see the inetd limit itself based on a parameter.

I am not arguing against that!!

I was simply not aware that the rate limit was no longer hard coded.

It would be nice to have both the rate limit AND max limit configurable
from the inetd.conf file.

Happy now?  :-)

... JG