From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 21 22:42:50 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6670016A4CE
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:42:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thetis.deor.org (thetis.deor.org [207.106.86.210])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BE243D2F
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:42:49 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rabbi@abditum.com)
Received: by thetis.deor.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 4F7A545045; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by thetis.deor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4117F4802D
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:42:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Len Sassaman <rabbi@abditum.com>
X-X-Sender: rabbi@thetis.deor.org
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401212239410.16137@thetis.deor.org>
X-AIM: Elom777
X-icq: 10735603
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: PGP 6.5.8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 06:42:50 -0000

Hi,

I'm interested in taking over the maintainer role for PGP 6.5.8. Ian
Goldberg and I wrote some patches a while ago which correct the known
problems in it. It still has its uses, particularly with older scripts,
and the internal crypto is more easily auditable than GnuPG. I believe it
should be still accessible through the ports tree.

Would it be possible to return PGP 6.5.8 to ports, with me as the
maintainer?

--Len.