Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:25:18 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Bernhard Froehlich <decke@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD ports list <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New OPTIONS and make.conf knobs Message-ID: <4FCDEC9E.3040804@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4FCD3800.4040305@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FCBF310.3090607@FreeBSD.org> <4FCC862F.9080203@quip.cz> <bf8b2e6947239faea63a8edf65aae7fe@bluelife.at> <4FCC9C24.5070001@quip.cz> <4FCD3800.4040305@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 04:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>> Yes, that's right. But I am confused why portmaster does not show the
>> options dialog to let user uncheck QT4?
>
> There is code to do this if you use the --force-config option. I haven't
> made that the default yet because it's a fairly complex part of the
> code, and I'm not sure that making it the default won't do more harm
> than good.
>
> Please try it and let me know how it goes for you.
It works with some minor problem...
----------------------------------------------------
# portmaster --force-config emulators/virtualbox-ose
===>>> Currently installed version: virtualbox-ose-4.1.16
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose
===>>> This port is marked BROKEN
===>>> QT4 frontend requires X11 support. Run 'make config' again!
----------------------------------------------------
Then it waits for a second or two and then displays the dialog.
I unchecked the QT4, confirmed with OK button and then options dialog
re-appeared again with my previously confirmed options.
So I confirmed the dialog again and then installation continues in
normal way.
Am I right, that --force-config will show options dialog even in cases
where I already have stored options for given port?
Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FCDEC9E.3040804>