From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 26 06:52:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA05516 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 26 Nov 1998 06:52:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from calumet.infoteam.com (calumet.infoteam.com [207.2.129.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA05511 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 1998 06:52:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kmartin@calumet.infoteam.com) Received: (from kmartin@localhost) by calumet.infoteam.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA27739; Thu, 26 Nov 1998 09:52:41 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199811261452.JAA27739@calumet.infoteam.com> From: "Kenn Martin" To: "FreeBSD Stable List" Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1998 09:53:37 -0500 Reply-To: "Kenn Martin" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 98 (4.10.1998) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NFS_SMALLFH Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 26 Nov 1998 01:22:22 -0800, Mike Smith wrote: >> After a cvsup, buildworld, installworld, kernel config/make/install, >> I now get this at boot: >> >> FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE #0: Thu Nov 26 01:42:07 EST 1998 >> ... >> struct nfsnode bloated (> 256bytes) >> Try reducing NFS_SMALLFH >> nfs_nhinit: bad size 268 >> >> >> I was able to grep this define in the code, but why should I have to >> change it as it appears to be using the default of 64? > >Grr. I didn't notice this when testing (but it's there in the log). > >This is the NFS accelerator stuff bloating the nfsnode (it's fully >packed out already). > >Can I have a judgement call on this - do we want the NFS performance >enhancement in 2.2.8? If so, what's the best way to avoid the >structure bloat (which is bad?) I would like to see the performance enhancement, but would have to look at the code to offer any suggestions. kenn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message