From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 1 06:07:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D22F106566B for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAE88FC0C for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2C664.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.198.100]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83C6C844859; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:07:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8018916A; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:06:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1254377218; bh=ZTNHNgnakRVx2KJK2TBAIfnsweh6spd4/awtxNxR/44=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=D1hK8UDYadKkMhri1xJwPSt/xlYLq0kdMqRNBLDVykFOJ88PFBrcqz2rScQ3P+MuU ohdBSPIs6kn1yG/EudE3d4BdQLAPbxIUYgOK5t/BElACcd2a0NQtpGs7XKYBjTEM0s pjIz6GXxP9Ht5sjd/taSbUjpgQacct47PWpUpaWcJ1QY0BAwRYV+H5B/0/8tQ6YDqB EGbtBcgI08XJzx5RQ+0006ljs/Jq1OQ2+QGyN/hOalcYfquWFTKGfplKjDQYIXwaL2 /pFhaZzZt6xf9Xbz+GOg/dL1dkJGliIKb7q7RPCFVMs91CZntEnZox+gulBgkWSl9r EcFB7poyxlZiw== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.3/8.13.8/Submit) id n9166vfs029932; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:06:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:06:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20091001080657.83133zg3oit7zj8k@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:06:57 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Jung-uk Kim References: <20090930135815.15151g7ho1epevgg@webmail.leidinger.net> <200909301918.45942.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200909301918.45942.jkim@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.5) / FreeBSD-8.0 X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 83C6C844859.2ACB0 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.44, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1254982022.07108@S7PkBjr53tgVPFYyUdD8ow X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: new ACPI warning after update to 9-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 06:07:08 -0000 Quoting Jung-uk Kim (from Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:18:44 -0400): > On Wednesday 30 September 2009 07:58 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> after updating form 8-beta2 to current (r197613) I get the >> following new message while booting: >> ---snip--- >> ACPI Warning: Detected an unsupported executable opcode at >> module-level: [0x7B] at table offset 0x94 (20090903/psloop-630) >> ACPI Warning: Detected an unsupported executable opcode at >> module-level: [0x7B] at table offset 0x99 (20090903/psloop-630) >> ---snip--- >> >> Anything I should provide additionally? What does it mean (the >> non-obvious meaning and the implications for the system)? > > New ACPICA added partial support for executable at module level, which > is illegal by specification and previously ignored without warning. > Unfortunately many BIOSes out there has broken DSDT/SSDT because > Windows ACPI interpreter does not care although it is illegal since > ACPI 2.0. I say "partial" because only three opcodes are supported > at module level ATM, i.e., If, Else, and While. Basically, it is > telling you that unsupported opcode is found at module level. For > more info, see the following commit: > > http://git.moblin.org/cgit.cgi/acpica/commit/?id=80d7951177315f70b5ffd8663985fbf725d07799 So - my BIOS is broken - it is doing more than before but not all it should do (according to the BIOS) - as the system was working before and working now, I do not need to worry After reading the commit log it looks like they want to support more in the future. Bye, Alexander. -- Put your best foot forward. Or just call in and say you're sick. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137