From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 02:49:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC5316A4CF; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:49:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAFE43D48; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:49:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DAn8dN001118; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:49:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Antal Rutz From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:39:03 +0100." <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:49:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1117.1073990948@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:49:13 -0000 In message <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net>, Antal Rutz writes: >Hi. > >I just read the status report of the year 2003 from DragonFlyBSD. > >I ask (not only) myself why don't we have something like this monthly or >bi-monthly. Because everybody who thought about this concept went on to think "and what is core@ doing about it ??!" rather than open an editor and begin to write :-) Seriously: It would be great to have. By all means begin right away! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.