Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:49:08 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Antal Rutz <arutz@mimoza.pantel.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <1117.1073990948@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:39:03 %2B0100." <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net>, Antal Rutz writes: >Hi. > >I just read the status report of the year 2003 from DragonFlyBSD. > >I ask (not only) myself why don't we have something like this monthly or >bi-monthly. Because everybody who thought about this concept went on to think "and what is core@ doing about it ??!" rather than open an editor and begin to write :-) Seriously: It would be great to have. By all means begin right away! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1117.1073990948>